Finance Chiefs Get Ready for New Rules

Finance Chiefs Get Ready for New Rules

Finance Chiefs Get Ready for New Rules

Finance chiefs will be busy in 2016, as they gear up for key changes in regulations in the U.S. and abroad.

From corporate tax plans to revenue from insurance contracts, chief financial officers will need to make sure their departments are nimble to cope with the next wave of compliance demands.

While some new accounting rules are past the development process, other compliance issues may be pegged to court cases or government action. Companies will have a few years to become fully compliant in some cases, but it doesn’t leave time for foot-dragging.

Here are some issues that will be a priority for CFOs in the coming year.

Revenue Recognition

CFOs received some breathing room when the Financial Accounting Standards Board disclosed it would allow companies to wait an until 2018—instead of 2017—to adopt rules governing how they account for deferred revenue from everything from cellphone contracts to car sales to software. U.S. companies have hundreds of billions of dollars of deferred revenue on their books and the rules will determine how much moves the top line, and when, on a case-by-case basis.

Still, many large firms say they have been preparing parallel books in preparation for the rule changes, and a delay would be costly and unnecessary. Some indicated in comment letters to FASB that they would adopt the rule early, which FASB will allow.

Lease Accounting

Companies in the U.S. and abroad will need to begin bringing their leases for offices and equipment onto their books in 2016, even though mandatory compliance is unlikely before 2019. Both the FASB in the U.S. and the overseas rule-maker the International Accounting Standards Board will publish their final standard early next year.

The new rules are aimed at better reflecting a company’s financial condition by including lease obligations, but it will also have the effect of making companies appear deeper in debt. CFOs will need to explain to shareholders why debt loads will seem bigger.

R. Harold Schroeder, a FASB member, said that shouldn’t pose a huge problem, as most investors already calculate those obligations on their own. “The benefit here is that instead of a back-of-the-envelope number, you’re going to get a figure that’s much more accurate,” he said.

Leases on balance sheets could cause some companies to violate debt covenants, but Mr. Schroeder said companies will have time to renegotiate those agreements. “Banks have made it clear they’re not going to kick out good customers just because of an accounting change,” he said.

Insurance Contracts

It’s unusual for accounting standard setters to target a specific industry, but both IASB and FASB are in the midst of adjustments to standards specifically for insurance contracts. Companies across several sectors could feel the effect of those changes.

An extended period of low interest rates wasn’t part of the equation when insurers drew up long-term contracts years ago. As a result, insurers may be dipping into their reserves to honor promises of minimum rates that they promised to pay when rates were higher, when they expected a larger return on their own capital.

“It is so vital that we get that standard out, especially given the pressure that the insurance industry is under,” said IASB Chairman Hans Hoogervorst. IASB will release its final standard in January, with an aim to complete the rule before the end of 2016.

As with the lease standard, companies are likely to have some years to adjust their systems before full compliance is required.

Companies that aren’t primarily insurers will want to pay attention to the new insurance guidelines because some of them have a toe in the industry, such as firms that sell extended warranties on their products. And as they are already doing with individual life insurance policies, insurance companies may be motivated to share more risk with their corporate clients if the new rules force them to disclose it.

Corporate Tax

The year is wrapping up with a long list of unsettled issues that will present challenges for corporate tax planning. Under congressional review are new proposals on tax base erosion and profit shifting, or BEPS, that have been submitted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Still on the legislative tax agenda are the roughly 50 temporary tax provisions that expired at the end of 2014 known as tax extenders, including the research-and-development tax credit and the “bonus depreciation” tax break that helps companies accelerate deductions for capital investments. Congress has typically renewed them every other year, and made them retroactive.

Overall, U.S. accounting standards setters are mindful of the scheduling challenges companies face when preparing for even the most minor changes.

“If you want to get something changed in the system for 2018 or ‘19, you’re already late in terms of…working with [information technology] systems to get it changed,” FASB’s Mr. Schroeder said.

WSJ

Finance Chiefs Get Ready for New Rules

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s